| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Maxi Dap
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
1
   |
Posted - 2015.05.21 19:21:21 -
[1] - Quote
The best solution would be to limit the number of ships that can target the same ship, a built in Target Spectrum breaker in to the mechanics of EvE, one that takes drones in to account as well. |
Maxi Dap
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.05.27 17:11:49 -
[2] - Quote
well there goes pve Ishtar again, still breathing thou, kick it again while on the ground in future patches. Eventually it will be as good as the rest of eve ships, we can have singularity then. |
Maxi Dap
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.05.28 06:35:48 -
[3] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Maxi Dap wrote:well there goes pve Ishtar again, still breathing thou, kick it again while on the ground in future patches. Eventually it will be as good as the rest of eve ships, we can have singularity then. not going to lie there are plenty of other ships you can use in pve that don't disrupt balance in the rest of the game. and yes things should always be balanced for pvp if the are overpowered in that area regardless of if they lose effectiveness in isk grinding or not
Ok, without lying let me see those other pve ships.
See if you can fit the criteria bellow:
460m budget
15 min C3 site clear avarage
Cruiser size hull
700+ dps out ot 65km range application |
Maxi Dap
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.05.28 08:39:23 -
[4] - Quote
Nagarythe Tinurandir wrote:
thats simply rediculous. this doesn't strike you as over the top?
Over the top compared to what? Hi-sec mission running? Incursions? I mean if I want to make 160m an hour in a C3 Wh where the risk is quet high thats over the top? Really?
It's nto the Ishtar thats broken, its every other (same sized hull) ship balanced for pvp that makes them suck in pve. Sure there is plenty of BS that are capable of pve, and they are out there. But didn't you guys get the memo? this is cruisers online.
|
Maxi Dap
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2015.05.29 07:41:31 -
[5] - Quote
Terra Chrall wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:
At 90 mill/BCS, I think you are a bit over budget...
According to O.sium this Tengu is only 450M which was within the budget constraints asked for. EDIT: O.Sium is not giving the right number.... or else I would not have brought this fit up. I'll see if I can fix it.
Never mind the cost, good luck with that tank in a C3 anom lol
|
Maxi Dap
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2015.05.30 23:12:17 -
[6] - Quote
Bailian Moxtain wrote:All these mission-peeps.. Have you ever heard of Ishtar Online? Well youre playing it and it sucks
and how many of those Ishtar fleets use Garde's as main drone?
|
Maxi Dap
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2015.05.31 17:45:12 -
[7] - Quote
I don't like these changes if that wasn't clear up until now..... but really the only bad thing here is the Garde nerf. The range on gardes is already less then reasonable. With 3 drone range modules on the Ishtar with perfect skills it has a 50km optimal, and at the same time that means that the speed and tank is not in the ranges that people complain about.
The problem is the long range sentries, warden goes up to 125km and bouncers hit to 77 in optimal. If those ranges would be brought down to below 60km with 30km falloff tops, it would help with all the issues that people are having in pvp without gimping pve boats to hell and back.
That would keep me smiling. |
| |
|